PCN150 Grand Canyon Week 3 Marijuana Annotated Bibliography Paper During Topic 1, you should have selected a drug for your large cumulative project and rec

PCN150 Grand Canyon Week 3 Marijuana Annotated Bibliography Paper During Topic 1, you should have selected a drug for your large cumulative project and received approval from your instructor. Now that you know which drug you will be researching, select four to six scholarly articles that you will use for your research paper. Please note that a majority of your scholarly resources should be within the last 5 years. Create an annotated bibliography that summarizes the information and relevance of the articles you have selected. For each article, provide the following: A 100- to 250-word summary of the article that includes a short explanation of why you have decided to include this resource. Refer to the resource, “Preparing Annotated Bibliographies,” located in the Writing Center, located in the Student Success Center for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Course Code
PCN-150
Class Code
PCN-150-O500
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Selected articles and relevancy
30.0%
Summary and explanation of each article
40.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
20.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Drug Study: Annotated Bibliography
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
The selected articles are not relevant and/or applicable to the
assignment and/or the minimum number of articles is not
included.
The annotated bibliography contains no summary for each
selected article chosen.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice
and/or sentence construction are used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
75.0
Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)
Not all of the selected articles are relevant or applicable to
the assignment and/or the minimum number of articles is not
included.
The annotated bibliography contains a summary for each
article; however, the summary does not include an
explanation as to why the resource is chosen.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or
word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but
not varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
The selected articles are relevant and applicable to the
assignment. The minimum number of articles is included and
a majority of the articles is from the last 5 years.
The annotated bibliography contains a summary for each
article and an explanation as to why the resource is chosen.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence
structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
The selected articles are sound, relevant, and applicable to
the assignment. The minimum number of articles is included
and the majority of the articles are within the last 5 years.
The annotated bibliography contains a sound summary for
each article and an explanation as to why the resource is
chosen.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
The selected articles are comprehensive, relevant, and
applicable to the assignment. All articles included are within
the last 5 years and represent the latest scholarly research.
The annotated bibliography contains a comprehensive
summary for each article and an explanation as to why the
resource is chosen.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Comments
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment