NU 452University of Texas Wk 5 Postpartum Depression in Women Research Topic- Postpartum depression in women. write a evidence based practice research and

NU 452University of Texas Wk 5 Postpartum Depression in Women Research Topic- Postpartum depression in women.
write a evidence based practice research and action plan(outline).
Provide three evidence-based research articles with your submission. Articles should be no older than 5 years old unless considered a classic.

• Conduct a literary review on evidence-based research regarding the topic( Postpartum depression in women)

• Discuss the significance/importance of the issue being discussed; support this statement with evidence-based data.

• Discuss risk factors, health promotion, screening/diagnostics, access to healthcare and legislation, current treatments, and upcoming research on treatment and management, level of public awareness
• Emphasize the role of the nurse as an advocate for women’s health issues
• Identify resources that the patient can avail of or be referred to by the health care team
• Health care is a business. Discuss how to meet the demands of the patient as a consumer and how nursing affects this process.
• Provide specific examples and details on all required points. Support your statements with evidence-based data.
• Connecting the concepts explored through the semester shows a broad scope of understanding Sample Action Plan
Title of Program: Breast Cancer Presentation
Cover Page & Format via APA (5 points)
Audience: (5 points)
Who would you be teaching?
Learning Outcome of Program aka Success Criteria and Goals of Program:
(10 points)
The demographic will learn basic information regarding breast cancer.
Individuals who are at high risk may be able to detect any cancerous tissues early
due to awareness.
Objectives: two to three (15 points)
To provide basic information on breast cancer
To identify what causes breast cancer/risk factors, prevention measures, and treatment.
Content Outline- Items to include with detail (40 points)
Overview
Body of Outline
• Definition
• Statistics on prevalence
• Significance/Importance to Women’s Health (EBP)
• Risk factors
• Screening
• Diagnosis
• Treatment
• Role of nurse to advocate
• Access to healthcare & community resources
• Current legislation & research
Tasks: (5 points)
To provide characteristics of the breast self-examination so the community may be able to
differentiate between what is normal and what isn’t.
Time-frame: (5 points)
Depends on the age group: ages 40 – 49 annual screenings, 50 – 74 biennial screenings
PICO question: (10 points)
Conduct a lit review of evidence based research regarding each category and based
upon your PICO question.
This is under your Syllabus a separate handout under week that will guide your
search criteria.
References via APA: (5 points)
Provide three evidence-based research articles with this outline submission. Articles should be
no older than 5 years old unless considered a classic.
The EBP Process
EBP is the integration of clinical expertise, patient values, and the best research evidence into the decision
making process for patient care. The first to speak to EBP was Dr. David Sackett in 1996. While his
application was to the field of medicine, it must be applied to nursing in order to manifest the best patient
outcomes.
Clinical expertise refers to the clinician’s cumulated experience, education and clinical skills.
The patient brings to the encounter his or her own personal and unique concerns, expectations, and values.
The best evidence is usually found in clinically relevant research that has been conducted using sound
methodology. (Sackett D, 2002)
.
Your assignment is to post your EBI articles dealing with the identified topic. To assist you with this project,
here is a refresher on the steps of EBP
1
The Steps in the EBP Process
ASSESS the
patient
Start with the patient — a clinical problem or question arises
from the care of the patient
ASK the
question
Construct a well built clinical question derived from the case
ACQUIRE
evidence
the
Select the appropriate resource(s) and conduct a search
the
Appraise that evidence for its validity (closeness to the truth)
and applicability (usefulness in clinical practice)
APPLY: talk
with the patient
Return to the patient — integrate that evidence with
clinical expertise, patient preferences and apply it to practice
Self-evaluation
Evaluate your performance with this patient
APPRAISE
evidence
Steps in Formulating the Clinical or PICO Question
The chart above presented the steps for identifying the BEST practices for
patient care. But you will see that the
of the process is to ASK the
clinical question. We call this the PICO question. Here are the steps to
formulating the perfect PICO question:
Step 1: Formulating a well-built question involves utilizing 4
components:
2
• The patient’s disorder or disease (P)
• The intervention or finding under review (I)
• A comparison intervention (if applicable/not always present) (C)
• The outcome. (O)
Step 2: Identifying articles and other evidence-based resources that
answer the question
Step 3: Critically appraising the evidence to assess its validity
Step 4: Applying the evidence
Step 5: Re-evaluating the application of evidence and areas for
improvement
Once you formulate the PICO question, you are on your way!
Let’s try identifying the PICO question components from this
example:
“In a 45-year-old woman with a 25-year-old history of obesity, would
a behavior modification program with diet and exercise compared to
the use of a diet suppressant drug alone be a better therapy for
resulting in long-term weight loss?”
What is Patient’s disease/problem? _________________________
What is Intervention under review? _________________________
What is the Comparison intervention? _______________________
What is the Outcome? ___________________________________
Answers:(P=obesity, I=diet & exercise, C=appetite suppressant drug therapy, O=long-term weight loss)
If you correctly identified the PICO components, you will have no problems
finding the appropriate articles for your assignment. Happy searching for the
“Evidence.”
3
NU452: FINAL PAPER RUBRIC
CRITERION
4
3
2
1
Completeness
Complete in all
respects; reflects all
requirements
Complete in most
respects; reflects most
requirements
Incomplete in many
respects; reflects few
requirements
Incomplete in most
respects; does not
reflect requirements
Understanding
Demonstrates a
sophisticated
understanding of
the topic(s) and
issues(s)
Demonstrates an
accomplished
understanding of the
topic(s) and issue(s)
Demonstrates an
acceptable
understanding of the
topic(s) and issue(s)
Demonstrates an
inadequate
understanding of the
topic(s) and issue(s)
Analysis,
Evaluation, and
Recommendati
ons
Presents detailed,
realistic, and
appropriate
recommendations
clearly supported
by the research
conducted
Presents specific,
realistic, and
appropriate
recommendations
supported by the
research conducted
Presents realistic or
appropriate
recommendations
supported by the
research conducted
Presents realistic or
appropriate
recommendations
with little, if any,
support from the
research conducted
Research
Presents relevant
and extensive
research; clearly
and thoroughly
documents all
sources of
information
Presents relevant
research; documents
all sources of
information
Presents limited
research; provides
limited
documentation of
sources consulted
Presents incomplete
research and
documentation
Clear reference to
Some reference to
the required text and
mostly academic
Limited reference to
academic resources
Majority of sources
utilized are nonacademic web sites
the required text
and academic
resources
resources
Writing
mechanics
Writing
demonstrates a
sophisticated
clarity, conciseness,
and correctness;
includes thorough
details and
relevant data and
information;
extremely wellorganized
Writing is
accomplished in
terms of clarity and
conciseness and
contains only a few
errors; includes
sufficient details and
relevant data and
information; wellorganized
APA guidelines
Uses APA guidelines
accurately and
consistently to cite
sources
Uses APA guidelines
with minor violations
to cite sources
Writing lacks clarity or
Writing is unfocused,
conciseness and
rambling, or contains
contains numerous
serious errors; lacks
errors; gives insufficient
detail and relevant
detail and relevant
data and information;
data and information;
poorly organized
lacks organization
Reflects incomplete
knowledge of APA
guidelines
Does not use APA
guidelines

Purchase answer to see full
attachment