American Institute Exploration of Antimicrobial Effects of Manuka Honey Lab PUBLIC HEALTH PROJECTS TOPICS: 1. Ebola. 2. Vaccination. 3. Food safety BIO

American Institute Exploration of Antimicrobial Effects of Manuka Honey Lab PUBLIC HEALTH PROJECTS TOPICS:

1. Ebola.

2. Vaccination.

3. Food safety

BIOME LAB PROJECT TOPICS:

1. Manuka Honey A Natural Antimicrobial

2. Essential Oil

3. Benefits of Garlic for Health

……………………………………………………………

Please I have attached rubric to it and the rubric is for all the topics and it will explain more about how it should be done. plus please I want you to add images/pictures on the work. I don’t need powerpoint, its just a word paper. Its a total of 6 papers, three from public health and three for Biome lab. It should include cover page, introduction, body pages and references page. Lab Research Project, Rubric
Abstract
(6 %)
100% (Excellent)
80%
60%
40%
0%
1. Brief rationale for the
experiment
One of the
“excellent”
conditions
is not met.
Two of the
“excellent”
conditions
are not
met.
Three of
the
“excellent”
conditions
not met.
None of
the
“excellent”
conditions
are met.
One of the
“excellent”
conditions
is not met.
Two of the
“excellent”
conditions
are not
met.
Three of
the
“excellent”
conditions
not met.
None of
the
“excellent”
conditions
are met.
One of the
“excellent”
conditions
is not met.
Two of the
“excellent”
conditions
are not
met.
Three of
the
“excellent”
conditions
not met.
None of
the
“excellent”
conditions
are met.
2. Brief summary of the
paper
3. Brief summary of the
experiments
4. Brief summary of the data
5. Brief summary of
discussion
6. Short and concise as
possible
Introduction
(10 %)
1. Title of the paper is
relevant.
2. Gives relevant
background information that
is complete and referenced.
3. States the purpose and
the context of the
experiment.
4. States hypothesis that is
based on research and/or
sound reasoning.
5. Brief summary of
experimental work.
Materials/
methods
1. All materials used are
listed.
(10 %)
2. Description of previously
published techniques are
included and properly cited.
3. Detailed explanation of
how to perform unique
techniques used.
4. Lab could be easily
repeated.
Results
(24 %)
1. Sections are presented in
a logical order, and easy to
see trends.
One of the
“excellent”
conditions
is not met.
Two of the
“excellent”
conditions
are not
met.
Three of
the
“excellent”
conditions
not met.
None of
the
“excellent”
conditions
are met.
One of the
“excellent”
conditions
is not met.
Two of the
“excellent”
conditions
are not
met.
Three of
the
“excellent”
conditions
not met.
None of
the
“excellent”
conditions
are met.
2. Each section begins with
an introductory sentence.
3. Contains appropriate
images/tables, which
summarize the data.
4. Saved para-filmed plates
for class observation.
5.
Graphs/tables/photographs
have appropriate labels and
titles.
6. Sections clearly explain
what was done, including a
short paragraph explaining
each graph or picture.
Discussion
(30 %)
1. All data in discussion is
present in results section,
and vice versatables/images cited.
2. Clear and logical
interpretation of data.
3. Clear, convincing
arguments for what the data
means and what types of
bacteria are inhibited.
4. References are
appropriately cited to back
up data analysis.
5. Clear link to research
done in introduction.
6. Hypothesis was/was not
supported.
7. Discussion of future
directions and/or what you
would have done differently.
8. Sources of error should be
addressed.
References
(10 %)
1. References are cited using
appropriate format (either
APA or MLA).
One of the
“excellent”
conditions
is not met.
Two of the
“excellent”
conditions
are not
met.
Three of
the
“excellent”
conditions
not met.
None of
the
“excellent”
conditions
are met.
One of the
“excellent”
conditions
is not met.
Two of the
“excellent”
conditions
are not
met.
Three of
the
“excellent”
conditions
not met.
None of
the
“excellent”
conditions
are
2. Appropriate/reliable
sources were cited.
3. At least four references
were used.
4. Sources were cited
appropriately in the text (in
text citations).
Format
(10 %)
1. All names are italicized.
(If applicable)
2. Genus is capitalized,
species is not. (If applicable)
3. Neat and organized.
4. Sections separated by
headings; appendix included
at the end with raw data.
5. Few spelling/grammar
errors
6. NO personalization.
Rubric for Public Health Project
PRESENTATION SKILLS (20%)
Were the main ideas presented in an orderly and clear manner?……………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Did the presentation fill the time allotted? ………………………………………………………………….

 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Were the overheads/handouts appropriate and helpful to the audience? ……………………….

 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Did the talk maintain the interest of the audience? ………………………………………………………

 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Was there a theme or take-home message to the presentation? ……………………………………

 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Was the presenter responsive to audience questions? ………………………………………………….

 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
KNOWLEDGE BASE (40%)
Was proper background information on the topic given? ………………………………………………

 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Was the material selected for presentation appropriate to the topic? …………………………….

 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Was enough essential information given to allow the audience to effectively evaluate the topic?
 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..


Was irrelevant or filler information excluded? ……………………………………………………………..

 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Did the presenter have a clear understanding of the material presented? ……………………….

 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
CRITICL THINKING (40%)
Were the main issues in this area clearly identified? …………………………………………………….

 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Were both theoretical positions and empirical evidence presented? ………………………………

 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Were the strengths and weaknesses of these theories, and the methods used to gather this evidence
adequately explained?…………………………………………………………………………………………………….

 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Did the presenter make recommendations for further work in this area? ………………………..

 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Did the main conclusions of the presentation follow from the material presented? ………….

 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Were competing explanations or theories considered and dealt with properly? ……………….
 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
OVERALL IMPRESSION
COMMENTS

Rubric for Classroom Discussion and Current Events
weight
50%
25%
25%
Exemplary
Effective
Minimal
1. Contributes to class
activities by offering
quality ideas and
asking appropriate
questions on a regular
basis
2. Actively engages others
in class discussions by
inviting their
comments
3. Constructively
challenges the
accuracy and relevance
of statements made
4. Effectively identifies
and summarizes main
points
5. Always prepared for
class with assignments
and required materials
6. Accurately expresses
foundational
knowledge pertaining
to issues raised during
the discussion
5. Contributes to class
activities by offering
ideas and asking
questions on a
regular basis
6. Often engages
others in class
discussions by
inviting their
comments
7. Challenges the
accuracy and
relevance of
statements made
8. Identifies and
summarizes main
points
7. Usually prepared
with assignments
and required
materials
8. Expresses basic
foundational
knowledge
pertaining to class
discussions
13.Usually positive and
cooperative with
classroom projects
and discussions
14.Often supportive of
other students’
ideas
1. Occasionally
contributes to class
activities by offering
ideas and asking
questions
2. Sometimes engages
others in class
discussions
3. Sometimes has an
understanding of
main points
4. Identifies and
summarizes some of
the main points
11. Consistently positive,
cooperative attitude
during class
12. Always supportive of
other students’ ideas
9. Seldom prepared
with assignments and
required materials
10. Expresses limited
foundational
knowledge pertaining
to class discussions
15. Seldom actively
participates in
classroom projects
and discussions
16. Sometimes
supportive of other
students’ ideas

Purchase answer to see full
attachment