The Industrial Contamination in Randal Reef in Hamilton Analysis Paper Working Alone or in a Group of 2:There are multiple sides to every story. For this a

The Industrial Contamination in Randal Reef in Hamilton Analysis Paper Working Alone or in a Group of 2:There are multiple sides to every story. For this assignment you will be required to work in groups of
one, two, three or four in order to create a “point/counterpoint” type of an argument. The goal of this is
to see how limiting the arguments can be when one side may be biased with an agenda. Many modern
Canadian issues involve stakeholders from many different backgrounds, with many different opinions.
Stakeholders are individuals who are directly involved in making decisions. They can be government
officials, celebrities, company owners, neighbourhood organizations, or anything else you find
applicable.
You are required to choose a stakeholder position (either for or against) one of the scenarios listed on
page 3 of this assignment. Using this foundation, you must have a back and forth debate within your
group. You were only asked to discuss the environmental challenges of these issues, however each of
these also has many consequences for social, economic, and health parameters in Canada. How you
organize this is up to you. You can choose to act as yourselves, or get into characters (an Indigenous
group vs. Justin Trudeau, David Suzuki vs. an oil company, Donald Trump vs. An anti-coal group, etc).
You must explain the format and setting of your debate (i.e., is it on Twitter between two or more
political figures? Is it a transcript from an interview? Is it a video interview? Was it a Facebook
argument? Is it on the class Discussion Forum?), and provide a copy of it (in text or picture/screen
capture format). Purchase answer to see full
attachment