5 stages of Team development: “forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning
A minimum of 150 words each question and References Response (#1 – 6) KEEP RESPONSE WITH ANSWER
1. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I also see team norms as a set of guidelines for how a person should behave in a group setting at work. It sets the foundation for what is acceptable behavior for everyone on the team. In order for team members to feel free to share their ideas and thoughts it is important for them to feel like they are in a safe respectful environment. Have you ever been on a team where one team member was disruptive? I do not feel that I have been however I have been on team where one person tried to take over or dominate what the team was going to do. Sometimes this was because team member were not giving their input and sometime that person was just taking over. It can be difficult when dealing with different personalities. I know that at times I can be shy so it can be harder for me to share ideas in a group. How do you interact in group settings and do you feel you personality plays a part in that?
2. Diversity in the workplace can have a number of benefits, including improved understanding of the marketplace, enhanced creativity and problem-solving ability in teams, and better use of talent. Diversity across dimensions, such as functional expertise, education, or personality, can increase performance by enhancing creativity or group problem-solving. In contrast, more visible diversity, such as race, gender, or age, can have negative effects on a group; at least initially. The worst kind of group for an organization that wants to be innovative and creative is one in which everyone is alike and gets along too well. One ramification of the finding that diversity stirs up the pot in healthy ways is that managers need to rotate the composition of their groups periodically to keep things fresh. But newcomers to the team should be different in some critical way, be it in an area of expertise, level of education, manner of thinking, or some similar dimension.
3. According to Bruce Tuckman, he said that teams go through 5 stages of development: “forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning.” (Schermerhorn, 2011) The stages start from the time that a group first meets until the project ends. The five stages of team development ensure that over time, the team gets to know one another to know what to anticipate from one another, to know how they can divide their duty and assign tasks. At the same time, they will know how to coordinate their work. Throughout this process, the members of a team will start to function as a team rather than a collection of people. An effective team is one that can achieve a high level of performance, viability, and satisfaction of the members (Jackson, 2002). For a team to become effective, it must go through the five stages. When you are in a team that works on a project or assignment, the team will get together, and brain storm. There will be many meetings. What I do is put after brainstorming, I put my team members in teams, let them brainstorm then come back as a collective and put ideas together and make one big plan, that works out.
4. The three phases that make up a compelling group are task execution, part fulfillment, and group suitability. Assignment execution is accomplished through amount, quality, and practicality of work finished, part fulfillment is when individuals feel their interest and encounters are certain and meet significant individual needs, and group suitability is when colleagues are fulfilled and will keep on cooperating on a venture. Team achievability is a significant factor in having a successful group. On the off chance that colleagues are not ready to cooperate the reasonability of the group will need eagerness and individuals won’t have the inspiration to finish the activity. At the point when colleagues can cooperate to finish work or assignment, they were given this offers collaboration. “Cooperative energy is the production of an entire that is more prominent than the aggregate of its part” implying that all together they will have the upside of each part’s aptitudes and experience to finish the activity in a convenient way contrasted with an individual taking the necessary steps themselves. Group standards, for example, shaping, raging, norming, performing, and suspending can tremendously affect how compelling a group can be. At the point when the group enters the main phase of framing, they will find out about one another to check whether they can cooperate on the off chance that this doesn’t occur and they can’t cooperate, at that point the adequacy of the group endures. When the second phase of raging creates, and undertakings are doled out to colleagues if the colleagues don’t “pull their own weight” and complete the assignments they are given. Other colleagues should “get a move on” to finish the activity, which makes it harder for those individuals.
5. A couples of examples that are very effective in the team decision making process are the Delphi technique as well as brainstorming. These are techniques that we use in our every day lives whether we know it or not. Brainstorming is pretty self-explanatory and involves a variety of ideas being thrown out freely. On the other hand, the Delphi technique is when the group has come to an agreement and a final decision ultimatley has been made. In order to avoid liabilities you have to “ensure that the project team is focused on the mission, do not overemphasize any aspect of the project, as well as not allowing personality conflicts to overshadow opinions, showing no favoritism that may influence objectivity, and not allowing judgment to be a part of the group.” (Schermerhorn, 2011). As I currently work at a local pizza place, problems arise almost every night as you can imagine. On big orders, its important that it is the main focus and we are not adding any extra pressure on eachother as we have to keep calm and complete the order. In this setting, everyone has almost the same authority so we keep eachother accountable and expect nothing but the best out of everyone.
6. One of the most common strategies is Brainstorming, which is something that is introduced to us as little kids. Brainstorming play an important role in just about every step of your career. My team meets on a daily basis, for a quick 15 minute power session. This meeting is usually at the very beginning of the day, and we share all sorts of ideas. Then, we have a weekly all-sales meeting with our counterpart team in Kentucky, to have an hour-long brainstorming session. Any associate can bring something to the table, and ideas are shared and constructive criticism is given back during this meeting. Although it is great for our team, it is a little hard to truly brainstorm with around 40 people. Typically, the smaller the group, the more efficient. Brainstorming shows that multiple ideas came to the table, and all ideas were discussed to help alleviate potential liabilities. Another method is the Delphi Method. “The Delphi method is a forecasting process framework based on the results of multiple rounds of questionnaires sent to a panel of experts. Several rounds of questionnaires are sent out to the group of experts, and the anonymous responses are aggregated and shared with the group after each round”(Twin). This technique will help truly overcome potential liabilities, since the ideas are shared and brought to the managers, so they can reduce all information down to their general consensus. At one time, our sales director wanted more ideas around marketing distribution. Via email, each salesman was able to send their input to the director, who then collaborated with the rest of the managers. All information was anonymous, and the managers were able to discuss all information with limited bias. Then, after discussion, they reduced all the ideas down to just a few. They then pushed out these final ideas to our team, and we were able to give our feedback once more. Finally, the managers meet again to finalize their decision. This allows all ideas to be thoroughly explored, while lmiting liabilities through the strict selection process. This is another idea that is fairly present in most workplaces, and can be found on multiple levels.